The hoped-for economies of outsourced or offshored development will quickly disappear if the code that's produced won't do the job.

Successful outsourcing therefore requires upfront investment in adopting, implementing and mastering an infrastructure of design, specification, collaboration, testing and life-cycle support to bring quality code to market in a timely manner. The tools of decentralized development must be benchmarked for their effectiveness in fusing multiple and often multicultural teams into an effective organization.

At eWEEK Labs, we're seeing this need reflected in the latest tools arriving here for review. We noted earlier this year, for example, the integration of real-time collaboration facilities in Sun Microsystems Inc.'s Java Studio Enterprise 7.0, winner of our fifth annual eWEEK Excellence Award for application development products.

To read a review of Java Studio Creator 2, click here.

This month, developers saw another toolmaker introduce conceptually similar collaboration aids: Borland Software Corp., with its JBuilder 2006.

During the next few months, developers will see even more sophistication in tools that make it possible to codify an outsourcing customer's requirements so there's minimal opportunity for confusion and misunderstanding.

This week, for example, will see the release of Version 3.0 of Agitar Software Inc.'s Agitator, a surprisingly intelligent test generation and application environment whose Version 2.0 edition won Excellence finalist honors earlier this year. Agitar's 3.0 release adds extensible facilities for incorporating specific task knowledge into the test generation process. The result is that sample data values and other test parameters more faithfully reflect the requirements that a piece of code will face in practice.

Click here to read a review of Agitator 2.0.

Technology such as Agitar's can address one of the key concerns of outsourcing critical line-of-business application development: that outside teams will lack understanding of an application's mission and environment, with blind spots that will lead to conceptual gaps or failure to make small but critical distinctions.

Agitator's extensible collection of customizable "expert" criteria sets can enable a core development team to automate some of its most useful expertise. Agitar's complementary Dashboard tool can then give that home team precise and timely information on an outsourcer's success in applying those rules to build measurably high-quality code.

During a prerelease discussion of the Version 3.0 update, eWEEK Labs asked Agitar engineers if their technology might lend itself to the formalization of quality measurements and the satisfaction of explicit quality requirements in outsourced development efforts. They responded with an internal draft of a forthcoming template for a "quality-level agreement," intended to be analogous to the SLAs (service-level agreements) often found in arrangements such as network service provisioning.

Agitar officials indicated that they're finding growing customer interest in making such agreements with development contractors, not merely for final acceptance of code but also for real-time monitoring of a provider's process. We expect to see such monitoring become the norm in the next two years.

eWEEK Labs is also seeing growing opportunity for a core development team to apply its big-picture perspective by customizing the capabilities of other types of testing tools. Later this year, for example, we expect to see the release of Compuware Corp.'s DevPartner Studio 8, which we examined in a prerelease form during Microsoft Corp.'s Professional Developers Conference in Los Angeles earlier this month.

Compuware's update should become available in the same time frame as Microsoft's long-awaited Visual Studio 2005, currently expected in November. Key to this Compuware extension of Microsoft's Visual Studio development environment will be new facilities, both predefined and open to custom extension, for higher-level diagnosis and problem-resolution guidance.

We've also seen this move to automate and customize developer guidance, aiding the process of aligning an outsourced team with a client's expectations, in tools such as Parasoft's Jtest (Version 7 of which shipped in June). In addition to Jtest's extensible collection of developer rules and coding standards, introduced earlier this year in Version 6, the June update added facilities for dynamically generating tests by automated inspection of running code.

Read a review of Jtest 6.0 here.

The facilities of Jtest 7, like Agitar's algorithms for detecting and codifying critical threshold situations, also accelerate learning in development teams and make it possible for tools to refine themselves over time. The latter point answers the often-asked question of whether software development is destined to become a race to the bottom, with lower coding costs being chased around the world like the labor that makes running shoes or hand-sews soccer balls.

Organizations that seek out, adopt and use the best available tools—and that take advantage of emerging technologies for knowledge-base extension, customization and guided learning—will become smarter teams that deliver greater value from both in-house and outsourced efforts.

While tools can't provide or pursue that vision alone, it's good to see them aiding those who have it.

Technology Editor Peter Coffee can be reached at peter_coffee@ziffdavis.com.

This article was originally published on eWEEK.com.