Opinion: Aggressive developers are taking the wheel in the drive to dynamic platforms.
Well, eWEEK's Jim Rapoza warned
Firefox users of likely problems with extension compatibility in
his review last week of Firefox 1.5: Others have since confirmed that
there's more
than a slight speed bump on the road to adopting this Web browser
update. Firefox is a tool that I recommend and that I've chosen for my
family to use (my own systems run Mozilla)--but
the distinctive Firefox
logo is also, to some degree, a warning sign of "Construction Ahead."
We're at risk of breaking our axles on more such obstacles as we
build more of our systems on remotely owned and operated Web services,
as well as on open-source technologies that rapidly evolve. Now that
both of these genres are out of the science-project stage of proving
that they work well enough to use at all, it's necessary to get them
into a more mature stage of life-cycle manageability.
ADVERTISEMENT
In the Dec. 12 eWEEK, readers who receive our Developer
Solutions special coverage will see my report on a roundtable
discussion of application life-cycle quality issues, practices and
tools. That conversation included participants from customer
organizations and from technology providers Segue Software, Identify Software and Microsoft.
What most impressed me about that conversation were the comments of
customers who are treating application quality as a strategic
opportunity, not merely as a housekeeping goal, and who are seeking out
best-of-breed technologies from both commercial tool providers and the
open-source ecosystem.
Crucially, a requirement just to get on these customers' radar is
the availability of tool APIs that let them build developer-centric
environments, in which information comes to the developer--for example,
through the ALF subproject of
Eclipse--rather than requiring developers to take their eye off the
road and go fiddle with some quality gadget that isn't part of their
core process.
Also aiding developers' move to a life-cycle orientation is today's
release of Mindreef
Coral, a Web services life-cycle collaboration platform. An SOA (service-oriented architecture) requires "a more formal way of
collaboration," said Jim Moskun, Mindreef's co-founder and chief
strategy officer, when we spoke in advance of today's
announcement. "The ad hoc collaboration that might work in a silo'd
environment won't work in an SOA environment," he said.
You'll get an inside look at a large-scale SOA project, involving
just that kind of choreographed collaboration, in another story in the
Dec. 12 eWEEK--where you'll find my case study of a NASA SOA
initiative that offers earth-science data users a unified metadata
model, embracing more than 60 million data items, combined with a UDDI v3-based environment for
discovering and chaining many different partners' services into
customized analytic tools.
Finally, another sign of the momentum toward dynamically assembled
systems comes with today's announcement of BBN Technologies' three-year
DARPA contract to develop urban
wireless communication platforms that resist infrastructure
disruption. As we found during the summer's Gulf Coast storms, the
flexibility of ad hoc networks like those
assembled by ham radio operators is crucial in the face of
extraordinary events.